This short article is created by Srishti Kaushal, a first-year student of Rajiv Gandhi nationwide University of Law, Punjab, pursuing B.A. LLB. (Hons.). In this article, she questioned the difference in between the presidential and also parliamentary creates of government, along with their benefits and disadvantages.

You are watching: What classification of government distinguishes between presidential and parliamentary government


More than 50% of the people today has a democratic government, which allows for famous participation with the electoral process. These autonomous governments can be representative or direct. 


In a direct democracy, political strength is inserted in the hands of all people in the state who come with each other to make a decision. In a representative democracy, on the other hand, people that are elected through an electoral procedure act together intermediaries in between the people of the state and also the plan decisions. Basically, a person chosen by the people takes decision on your behalf.

Now a representative democracy have the right to be split into Parliamentary and Presidential democracy. In this article, we will talk about the features, advantages and defect of both that these species of representative governments, and also the difference between them.

Presidential kind of government

A Presidential mechanism is additionally called a conference system. It refers to a mechanism of governance in which the chairman is the cook Executive and is elected directly by the people. The head the the federal government thus exists individually from the legislature. It is a type of federal government where the 3 branches (legislature, executive and judiciary) exist separately and cannot i disbanded or dissolve the various other branch. If the legislature makes the laws, the chairman enforces them and it is the courts that space responsible for exercising judicial duties.

The beginning of the Presidential type of government can be traced ago to middle ages England, France and Scotland, whereby the executive authority lay through the monarch or Crown (King/Queen) and also not the estates of the kingdom (Parliament). This influenced the constitutional makers of the United states of America, who produced the office the President, because that which direct elections were to be held. Let’s have a look in ~ the nations where the Presidential mechanism is complied with today.



Central and South America

The United says of America; Argentina; Bolivia; Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic; Ecuador; El Salvador; Guatemala; Honduras; Mexico; Nicaragua; Panama; Paraguay; Peru; Uruguay; Venezuela.


Angola; Benin; Burundi; Cameroon; central African Republic; Chad; Comoros; Republic that Congo; Gabon; Gambia; Ghana; Guinea; Kenya; Liberia; Malawi; Mozambique; Nigeria; Sierra Leone; Seychelles; Sudan; south Sudan; Tanzania; Togo; Zambia; Zimbabwe.


Indonesia; Maldives; Palau; Philippines; southern Korea.

The Middle eastern and main Asia

Afghanistan; Iran; Belarus; Cyprus; Kazakhstan; Tajikistan; Turkmenistan; Uzbekistan; Yemen.

To know this device better, let’s look at its features, advantages and disadvantages.


The Presidential mechanism of democratic governance has the following features: 

President does not have actually nominal powers. The is both the head that the executive and the head of the state. As the head that the executive, he has actually a ceremonial position. Together the head that the government, the acts together the chief real executive. Thus, the Presidential mechanism is qualified by a solitary executive concept.President is straight elected by the human being or the electoral college.The President can not be removed, other than through one impeachment procedure because that a tomb unconstitutional act.The president governs with the help of a small body of people. This is his cabinet. The cabinet is just an advisory body which is composed of non-elected departmental secretaries, who room selected by the president. That is responsible to the President, and also the departmental secretaries have the right to be eliminated by him.The President and also his cabinet room not responsible to the legislature, nor room they members of the legislature.The principle of Separation of powers is plainly visible in the Presidential system. The 3 branches are completely separated and also members of one branch cannot be the members of the other branch. The President have the right to veto the action of the legislature. He/She can also grant pardon.


Now let’s look in ~ the advantages of having actually a Presidential system:

In many Presidential systems, the president is elected straight by the people. This creates more legitimacy than that the a leader who has actually been appointed indirectly.Since in a Presidential system the branches the the government work separately, it becomes less complicated to maintain the mechanism checks and balances.The President, under this system, is usually less constrained and also can take decisions an ext independently. Thus, this system permits for quick decision making. This becomes very beneficial at the moment of crisis.A Presidential government is an ext stable. This is since the term of the president is fixed and is not topic to majority support in the legislative. Hence, he/she go not need to worry around losing the government. Since it is the President that chooses his cabinet and also the executive need not be legislators, the president is may be to pick experts in various areas to head relevant departments in his government. This guarantee that only the human being who are capable and knowledgeable form part the the government.Once the choice is complete and also the president gains power, the whole nation accepts him/her. Politics rivalries space forgotten and people look at problems from a nationwide view, quite than a party view.


There are specific disadvantages which come v the Presidential System. Let’s know what this are:

The Presidential kind of governance is autocratic as it areas a lot of power in the hands of one person, i.e., the President. Also, the president is out of the control of the legislature.The complete separation between the legislature and executive may bring about conflicts and a deadlock in between the executive and also the legislature. The legislature may refuse to expropriate the plans of the executive; while the executive may not agree to the acts passed through the legislature, and also the president may even veto them.This system offers the chairman the strength to pick the people of his an option for his room to type the government. The President might misuse this power and also choose his relatives, service partners etc, i m sorry might affect the political functioning of the state.It leads to less accountability in the government and may also an outcome in the legislature and the executive play the blame game in time that crisis.Parliamentary form of government

A Parliamentary kind of democracy is additionally known as the Cabinet type of government or the ‘Responsible Government’. It describes a device of administration in which the citizens selected representatives come the legislature Parliament. This conference is responsible to make the decisions and also laws for the state. It is additionally directly answerable to the people. 

As a an outcome of the elections, the party through the biggest representation develops the government. That leader i do not care the element Minister and performs various executive functions in addition to the members of conference appointed by the prime Minister to the cabinet. 

The parties who shed the elections type the minority and serve together opposition in the Parliament. This parties difficulty the decisions of the party in power. The element Minister may be gotten rid of from power in situation the members of Parliament shed confidence in him.

Attempts to create a mechanism of parliament democracy were checked out in the European revolution of 1848 however these did not lead to any consolidated system. Parliament democracy happened in 1918 and also developed throughout the twentieth century.

Let’s look at the countries which have actually a parliamentary democracy.



North and South America

Antigua and also Barbuda; The Bahamas; Barbados; Belize; Canada; Dominica; Grenada; Jamaica; Saint Kitts and also Nevis; Saint Lucia; Saint Vincent and also Grenadines; Trinidad and Tobago; Suriname.


Bangladesh; Bhutan; Cambodia; India; Iraq; Israel; Japan; Kuwait; Kyrgyzstan; Lebanon; Malaysia; Myanmar; Nepal; Pakistan; Singapore; Thailand.


Albania; Andorra; Armenia; Austria; Belgium; Bulgaria; Croatia; Czech Republic; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Iceland; Ireland; Italy; Kosovo; Latvia; Luxembourg; Malta; Moldova; Montenegro; Netherlands; phibìc Macedonia; Norway; mountain Marino; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; unified Kingdom.


Australia; new Zealand; Papua brand-new Guinea; Samoa; Vanuatu.

Now stop look at the features, advantages and disadvantages of Parliamentary form of government to know it better.

Click above


The head that state and also the head of government are different under the Parliamentary kind of government. The head that the state is commonly the president or monarch. He/she has actually only ceremonial powers. The head of the federal government is typically the prime Minister and he/she is vested with real power.It can be one of two people bicameral (with two houses) or unicameral (with one house). A bicameral system usually is composed of a straight elected reduced house, which in turn elects the top house.The strength of government are not fully separated. The lines in between the legislature and the executive space blurred as executive forms component of the legislature.This device is additionally characterised v the bulk party rule. However no federal government can be a hundred percent majority, and also the Parliament likewise consists the the opposition.The the supervisory board of ministers, in this system, are jointly responsible to the Parliament. The lower residence of parliament can also dismiss the ruling government by pass a no confidence movement in the house. Most of the time, in this kind of federal government the room proceedings room kept mystery and room not intended to it is in divulged to the public.


Adopting a Parliamentary system of governance has details advantages. Stop look at these in detail:

There is much better coordination in between the legislature and the executive. This is since executive is part of the legislature and most members the the lower residence support the government . Thus, in parliament system, over there is lesser tendency of disputes and also conflicts, which provides it comparatively simpler to pass legislation and also implement it.This type of federal government is much more flexible as, if required, the element Minister can be changed. Because that instance, in the UK during the second World War, element Minister Neville Chamberlain was changed by Winston Churchill. A parliament democracy permits representation of varied groups. This mechanism gives methods to various diverse ethical, racial, linguistic and also ideological groups to share your views and enable making of far better and suitable laws and policies.Since, the executive is responsible to the Parliament, it has the power to save a check upon the activities of the executive. Moreover, the members the the Parliament can move resolutions, talk about matters and ask questions of public interest to put pressure on the government. This permits responsible governance. Parliamentary system prevents autocracy. This is since the executive, management is responsible come the legislature, and it is possible to vote the end the element Minister v a no confidence motion. Thus, power does no get concentrated in the hands of only one person.In case, the no confidence activity is passed, the leader of the state invites the the opposite to form the government. Thereby, this system provides an alternate government. 


The houses of parliament system likewise has details disadvantages. These are:

Because that party fragmentation, the legislators cannot exercise their cost-free will and also vote as per their own understanding and opinions. Rather, they need to follow the party policy.The system might lead to legislators who intend to enter the executive only. They are mostly unqualified to legislate, which deserve to hamper the functioning of the government.Since the executive is created of the members of the to win party, the is not the specialists who head the departments.Since, in the parliamentary system, tenure the the council of ministers is totally dependant upon their popularity, over there is no addressed tenure. As such they frequently hesitates to take it bold and also long-term plan decisions.Such governments might prove to it is in unstable. This is because the government exists only as lengthy as castle maintain majority support in the house. Plenty of a times, once coalition next come right into power, the government is short lived and disputes arise. Since of this, the executive puts all of its focus upon remaining in power, fairly than worrying about the welfare of people and also state that affairs.

In India

In India, the system of democracy which exists is the houses of parliament Democracy. This model has been obtained from the UK, but there are details differences:

While in the UK, the element Minister can only it is in from the reduced house, in India, the element Minister have the right to be from both Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha.While in the UK as soon as a human is appointed as the speaker, he/she end to it is in a member the his/her party, in India, the speaker proceeds to it is in a member that his/her party yet must make sure that he/she is impartial in the proceedings.Difference in between the Parliamentary and also Presidential creates of the Government


Parliamentary form of Government

Presidential type of Government


It is a form of government where the legislature and also executive are carefully related to every other. The is a mechanism in i m sorry the citizens elect representatives to the legislative branch Parliament.

It is a system of government in which the 3 organs of the government – the executive, judiciary, legislature job-related separately. In it, the chairman is the cook executive and is elected straight by the citizens.


There is dual executive together leader of the state and leader that the government are different.

There is a solitary executive as the leader that the state and the leader that the federal government is the same.


The ministers belong to the ruling party and also are Members of Parliament. No outsider is allowed to become a minister.

The ministers can be favored from external the legislature, and also are usually market experts.


The executive, management is account to the Legislature. 

The executive, management is no accountable to the Legislature.

Dissolution of lower house

The element Minister deserve to dissolve the lower house.

The President can not dissolve the lower house.


The tenure that the element Minister counts upon the majority support in the Parliament, and is thus, no fixed.

The tenure the the president is fixed.

Separation that Powers

The principle of Separation of strength is not complied with strictly. Over there is concentration and fusion of powers in between the Legislative and also the Executive.

The rule of Separation of powers is strict followed. Powers room divided and the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary occupational separately. 

Party Discipline

Party discipline is stronger and the device leans in the direction of unified action, block voting and distinct party platforms.

Party technique is comparatively less and failure come vote v one’s party does no threaten the government.


This kind of government is much less autocratic as enormous power is not given to just one person.

This form of federal government is much more autocratic as enormous power is focused in the hands of the President.


The device of governance in countries differs depending on whether a nation has a Presidential or parliament system. There room some nations who have adopted a mixture that both these species as well. This systems have multiple differences based on separation of powers, accountability, executives etc.

See more: Lori Wants To Set Up A Soho Network In Her Apartment, Basic Wired/Wireless Soho Network

Both that these systems come with their own advantages and disadvantages. A nation chooses the system which suits that the most. The parliamentary system allows representative governance, which is an ideal in a diverse nation like India.